Systems and Asylum Procedures
After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures throughout Europe, new technologies are now reviving these types of systems. Coming from lie detection tools examined at the line to a program for confirming documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of solutions is being utilized in asylum applications. This article is exploring www.ascella-llc.com/portals-of-the-board-of-directors-for-advising-migrant-workers just how these technologies have reshaped the ways asylum procedures are conducted. It reveals just how asylum seekers happen to be transformed into obligated hindered techno-users: They are asked to comply with a series of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with unstable tiny within criteria and deadlines. This obstructs the capacity to navigate these systems and to follow their right for coverage.
It also demonstrates how these technologies are embedded in refugee governance: They assist in the 'circuits of financial-humanitarianism' that function through a whirlwind of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers' socio-legal precarity simply by hindering them from interacting with the stations of coverage. It further states that examines of securitization and victimization should be coupled with an insight in to the disciplinary mechanisms of these technologies, by which migrants happen to be turned into data-generating subjects exactly who are regimented by their reliability on technology.
Drawing on Foucault's notion of power/knowledge and comarcal expertise, the article states that these technologies have an inherent obstructiveness. They have a double impact: while they assistance to expedite the asylum method, they also produce it difficult for refugees to navigate these types of systems. They are simply positioned in a 'knowledge deficit' that makes all of them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions created by non-governmental actors, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their conditions. Moreover, they pose new risks of'machine mistakes' which may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.
